Risk scoring that prioritizeswhat actually matters
Evaluate findings across your external surface based on exposure, severity, and context so your team can focus on the risks that require attention first.
Severity model
Weighted impact
Prioritization based on how meaningful a finding is to overall posture.
Priority logic
Exposure aware
Severity is evaluated alongside external reachability and context.
Portfolio level
Risk prioritization
Current level
Response tiers
Decision signals
Critical
Immediate attention
High
Prompt review
Medium
Tracked risk
Low
Visibility support
Why it matters
Not all findings carry the same weight
External risk is not just about what is found. It is about how exposed it is, how severe it is, where it sits, and whether it changes the urgency of response.
High priority
Conditions that combine stronger impact with meaningful exposure.
Review
Findings that need analyst attention based on context or posture.
Monitor
Lower-urgency conditions that still matter for visibility over time.
Risk tiers
Different findings call for different response levels
A useful scoring model helps separate urgent remediation from important review work and ongoing visibility.
Critical
Conditions that require immediate attention due to impact and exposure.
High
Findings that should be reviewed promptly based on reachability or context.
Medium
Lower urgency conditions that still contribute to overall security posture.
Low
Informational findings that support visibility and longer-term assessment.
Next steps
Prioritize risk with stronger context and less noise
Evaluate external findings with clearer scoring logic so your team can focus remediation effort where it matters most.