Detection gap analysisfor real visibility
Identify attacker behavior that was missed, delayed, or surfaced without enough context to support action.
Signal review
Red team replay
Missed visibility
Activity executed without reliable visibility.
Weak context
Signals lacked fidelity for confident triage.
Late escalation
Delay reduced the value of existing signal.
Visibility depth
How much of attacker behavior was actually visible.
Signal fidelity
Whether alerts carried enough meaning to support action.
Escalation friction
Where workflow or ownership slowed the response path.
Improvement focus
Which changes close the most important defensive gaps first.
Gap analysis outcomes
What defenders saw is only part of the story.
Detection Gap Analysis is designed to show where attacker activity failed to become actionable defensive awareness. The important question is not simply whether something fired, but whether it fired with enough relevance, speed, and context to support a meaningful decision.
In many environments, some signal exists. The problem is that it is fragmented, delayed, weak, or buried inside noise. That means teams may technically “see” activity without understanding its importance early enough to respond well.
The outcome of this review is a clearer picture of where visibility is thin, where escalation loses momentum, and where practical defensive improvements would reduce the most uncertainty first.
Get started
Turn attacker activity into clearer defensive improvement.
Run a Detection Gap Analysis to understand where visibility failed, where signals were weak, and what to improve first.